miller vs. kronenbourg

going to the freebutt last thursday left me with a perplexing decision - i couldn't remember which one of these was better(and you can hardly get miller anywhere). the miller proved very drinkable, almost pleasant, whilst i have finally realised kronenbourg (which i ended up having later in the evening) is a pretty poor lager. not much better than foster's or carling. it's fine in a snakey-b though. why has it taken me so long to give up on kronenbourg? how many times have i drank it as a second choice and been disappointed? it's the power of marketing.

also: Ch'ti brune, drank from the bottle on the level. this didn't really have much going for it, but nothing at all against it. it was fine in every respect. i'd like to try it from a glass, most things are better with a nose.